Membership Teachers Trainees Trainers Graduates Teacher career path Trainer accreditation Course check Our standards Live CV Readiness check
Insurance United Kingdom Ireland United States Trainee cover Corporate booking Training providers Retreats
Find Find a teacher Find a partner Find a course (ATP)
Industry The field News Resources library The letter About YogaPros Find the Balance
Partners Programme overview The directory Book a call with Louise Premium terms Standard terms
Member login
A mature yoga teacher holds warrior pose on a temple veranda — watercolor illustration · YogaPros institutional art.
Resources · State of Compliance

Held to our own standards.

The institutional disclosure framework YogaPros publishes about itself — standards-of-conduct decisions, removal-for-breach cases, accreditation audit outcomes, governance reviews. Held publicly because we hold members publicly.

The disclosure schema

Five categories. Published in public.

Most professional bodies will tell you they hold members to standards. Few will tell you what they hold themselves to. The disclosure schema is the institutional answer.

01 · Standards-of-conduct decisions.

Aggregate cases reviewed, decisions made, outcomes by type. Anonymous to the member, transparent to the field. The audit trail of how the body actually applies its own standards in real cases.

02 · Removal-for-breach cases.

Removals are real. The number is published. The pattern of breaches is published. Members and the public know what the body will not tolerate — because the body has actually not tolerated it.

03 · Accreditation audit outcomes.

Training providers audited, audit findings, providers retained or removed. The same scrutiny applied to ATPs that members get from us is applied back, transparently.

04 · Insurance claims aggregate.

Anonymised aggregate of claims that ran through the cover — type, frequency, outcomes. The field learns from real claims data, not from anecdote.

05 · Governance & conflicts.

Council decisions, declared conflicts, governance reviews. The body holds itself to the same audit trail it holds members to.

Compliance held in public is compliance the field can trust. Compliance held in a desk drawer is a preference.

Why disclosure compounds

What gets published, hardens.

01 · Members trust

If we publish our own audit, our audits of you mean more.

A body that audits members but never itself is asymmetric. Symmetric audit — in public both ways — builds member trust over twenty years more reliably than any marketing campaign could.

02 · Field learns

Anonymised data is field-changing.

When the field knows what the actual conduct breaches look like, what the actual claims patterns are, what the actual audit findings are — the field gets safer. Disclosure is a public good.

03 · Regulators see

The body that audits itself doesn’t need to be audited from outside.

Regulators read transparency as competence. A body that publishes its own conduct decisions, removals, and audit outcomes is a body the regulator does not need to manage closely.

04 · Time hardens it

Twenty years of disclosure becomes the moat.

A new entrant cannot fake twenty years of published audit decisions. Disclosure history is its own moat — uncopyable, time-stamped, public.

The State of Compliance is published quarterly. Each report is a real document of real decisions. The body holds itself to the schema, in public, year after year.

Not sure which tier

Take the readiness check.

Seven questions. Three minutes. No account needed. See where you are in your career — and which tier fits.

Take the Readiness Check Free · No follow-up · Not everyone is accepted